- Title
- The Decision to prosecute: a comparative analysis of Australian prosecutorial guidelines
- Creator
- Hodgson, Natalie; Cashmore, Judy; Cowdery, Nicholas; Goodman-Delahunty, Jane; Martschuk, Natalie; Parkinson, Patrick; Powell, Martine B.; Shackel, Rita
- Relation
- ARC.160103688 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP160103688
- Relation
- Criminal Law Journal Vol. 44, Issue 3, p. 155-172
- Relation
- https://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/2020/08/04/criminal-law-journal-update-vol-44-pt-3
- Publisher
- LawBook Co
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2020
- Description
- The decision whether to prosecute an individual can potentially impact a number of private and public interests. In Australia, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in each jurisdiction provides written prosecutorial guidelines relating to the decision to prosecute. Little scholarly attention has focused on how these guidelines differ in form and impact across jurisdictions. This article undertakes a text-based comparative analysis of the guidelines to identify the key similarities and differences in how the decision to prosecute is articulated in the policies of different Australian jurisdictions. This analysis shows that the tests used across Australia are broadly similar, while also identifying a number of differences. We highlight the need for empirical research on the decision to prosecute, to provide an insight into how the decision to prosecute is operationalised in practice, and how different formulat ons of the same or similar tests might impact the decision-making process.
- Subject
- prosecute; prosecutorial guidelines; analysis; Australia
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1441903
- Identifier
- uon:41569
- Identifier
- ISSN:0314-1160
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1680
- Visitors: 1675
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|